Questions to Consider
Not all nor nearly all of the murders done by white men, during the past thirty years in the South, have come to light, but the statistics as gathered and preserved by white men, and which have not been questioned, show that during these years more than ten thousand Negroes have been killed in cold blood, without the formality of judicial trial and legal execution....
The first excuse given to the civilized world for the murder of unoffending Negroes was the necessity of the white man to repress and stamp out alleged "race riots." For years immediately succeeding the war there was an appalling slaughter of colored people, and the wires usually conveyed to northern people and the world the intelligence, first, that an insurrection was being planned by Negroes, which, a few hours later, would prove to have been vigorously resisted by white men, and controlled with a resulting loss of several killed and wounded. It was always a remarkable feature in these insurrections and riots that only Negroes were killed during the rioting, and that all the white men escaped unharmed....
Then came the second excuse, which had its birth during the turbulent times of reconstruction. By an amendment to the Constitution the Negro was given the right of franchise, and, theoretically at least, his ballot became his invaluable emblem of citizenship. In a government "of the people, for the people, and by the people," the Negro's vote became an important factor in all matters of state and national politics. But this did not last long. The southern white man would not consider that the Negro had any right which a white man was bound to respect, and the idea of a republican form of government in the southern states grew into general contempt. It was maintained that "This is a white man's government," and regardless of numbers the white man should rule. "No Negro domination" became the new legend on the sanguinary banner of the sunny South, and under it rode the Ku Klux Klan, the Regulators, and the lawless mobs, which for any cause chose to murder one man or a dozen as suited their purpose best....
The white man's victory soon became complete by fraud, violence, intimidation and murder. The franchise vouchsafed to the Negro grew to be a "barren ideality," and regardless of numbers, the colored people found themselves voiceless in the councils of those whose duty it was to rule. With no longer the fear of "Negro Domination" before their eyes, the white man's second excuse became valueless. With the Southern governments all subverted and the Negro actually eliminated from all participation in state and national elections, there could be no longer an excuse for killing Negroes to prevent "Negro Domination."
Brutality still continued; Negroes were whipped, scourged, exiled, shot and hung whenever and wherever it pleased the white man so to treat them, and as the civilized world with increasing persistency held the white people of the South to account for its outlawry, the murderers invented the third excuse--that Negroes had to be killed to avenge their assaults upon women. There could be framed no possible excuse more harmful to the Negro and more unanswerable if true in its sufficiency for the white man....
A word as to the charge itself. In considering the third reason assigned by the Southern white people for the butchery of blacks, the question must be asked, what the white man means when he charges the black man with rape. Does he mean the crime which the statutes of the civilized states describe as such? Not by any means. With the Southern white man, any mesalliance existing between a white woman and a colored man is a sufficient foundation for the charge of rape. The Southern white man says that it is impossible for a voluntary alliance to exist between a white woman and a colored man, and therefore, the fact of an alliance is a proof of force. In numerous instances where colored men have been lynched on the charge of rape, it was positively known at the time of lynching, and indisputable proven after the victim’s death, that the relationship sustained between the man and woman was voluntary and clandestine, and that in no court of law could even the charge of assault have been successfully maintained.
During all the years of slavery, no such charge was ever made, not even during the dark days of the rebellion, when the white man, following the fortunes of war went to do battle for the maintenance of slavery. While the master was away fighting to forge the fetters upon the slave, he left his wife and children with no protectors save the Negroes themselves. And yet during those years of trust and peril, no Negro proved recreant to his trust and no white man returned to a home that had been despoiled.
Likewise during the period of alleged “insurrection,” and alarming “race riots,” it never occurred to the white man that his wife and children were in danger of assault. Nor in the Reconstruction era, when the hue and cry was against “Negro Domination.” was there ever a thought that the domination would ever contaminate a fireside or strike toward the virtue of womanhood. It must appear strange indeed, to every thoughtful and candid man, that more than a quarter of a century elapsed before the Negro began to show signs of such infamous degeneration....
It is his regret, that, in his own defense, he must disclose to the world the degree of dehumanizing brutality which fixes upon America the blot of a national crime. Whatever faults and failings other nations may have in their dealing with their own subjects or with other people, no other civilized nation stands condemned before the world with a series of crimes so peculiarly national. It becomes a painful duty of the Negro to reproduce a record which shows that a large portion of the American people avow anarchy, condone murder and defy the contempt of civilization.
These pages are written in no spirit of vindictiveness, of all who give the subject consideration must concede that far too serious is the condition of that civilized government in which the spirit of unrestrained outlawry constantly increases in violence, and casts its blight over a continually growing area of territory. We plead not for the colored people alone, but for all victims of the terrible injustice which puts men and women to death without form of law. During the year 1894, there were 132 persons executed in the United States by due form of law, while in the same year, 197 persons were put to death by mobs, who gave the victims no opportunity to make a lawful defense. No comment need be made upon a condition of public sentiment responsible for such alarming results....
Lynching Statistics from A Red Record, 1895
II. LYNCH LAW STATISTICS
the record published in the Chicago Tribune, January 1, 1894, the following
computation of lynching statistics is made referring only to the colored victims
of Lynch Law during the year 1893:
15, Paul Hill, Carrollton, Ala.; Sept. 15, Paul Archer, Carrollton, Ala.; Sept.
15, William Archer, Carrollton, Ala.; Sept. 15, Emma Fair, Carrollton, Ala.
23, unknown negro, Fannin, Miss.
25, Calvin Thomas, near Brainbridge, Ga.
28, Tillman Green, Columbia, La.
26, Patrick Wells, Quincy, Fla.; Feb. 9, Frank Harrell, Dickery, Miss.; Feb. 9,
William Filder, Dickery, Miss.
21, Richard Mays, Springville, Mo.; Aug. 14, Dug Hazleton, Carrollton, Ga.;
Sept. 1, Judge McNeil, Cadiz, KY.; Sept. 11, Frank Smith, Newton, Miss.; Sept.
16, William Jackson, Nevada, Mo.; Sept. 19, Riley Gulley, Pine Apple, Ala.; Oct
9, John Davis, Shorterville, Ala.; Nov. 8, Robert Kennedy, Spartansburg, S.C.
16, Richard Forman, Granada, Miss.
14, David Jackson, Covington, La.
21, Thomas Smith, Roanoke, Va.
12, four unknown negroes, near Selma, Ala.
30, Thomas Carr, Kosciusko, Miss.; Feb. 7, William Butler. Hickory Creek,
Texas; Aug. 27 Charles Tart, Lyons Station, Miss.; Dec. 7, Robert Greenwood,
Cross County, Ark; July 14, Allen Butler, Lawrenceville, Ill.
24, two unknown negroes, Knox Point, La.
Edward Wagner, Lynchburg, Va.; Nov. 4, William Wagner, Lynchburg, Va.; Nov. 4,
Samuel Motlow, Lynchburg, Va.; Nov. 4, Eliza Motlow, Lynchburg, Va.
21, Robert Landry, St. James Parish, La.; Jan. 21, Chicken George, St. James
Parish, La.; Jan. 21, Richard Davis, St. James Parish, La.; Dec. 8, Benjamin
Menter, Berlin, Ala.; Dec. 8, Robert Wilkins, Berlin, Ala.; Dec. 8, Joseph
Gevhens, Berlin, Ala.
COMPLICITY IN MURDER
16, Valsin Julian, Jefferson Parish, La.; Sept. 16, Basil Julian, Jefferson
Parish, La.; Sept. 16, Paul Julian, Jefferson Parish, La.; Sept. 16, John
Willis, Jefferson Parish, La.
29, Samuel Thorp, Savannah, Ga.; June 29, George S. Riechen, Waynesboro, Ga.;
June 30, Joseph Bird, Wilberton, I. T. [Indian Territory]; July 1, James Lamar,
Darien, Ga.; July 28, Henry Miller, Dallas, Texas; July 28, Ada Hiers,
Walterboro, S.C.; July 28, Alexander Brown, Bastrop, Texas; July 30, W. G.
Jamison, Quincy, Ill.; Sept 1, John Fergnson, Lawrens, S.C.; Sept. 1, Oscar
Johnston, Berkeley, S.C.; Sept. 1, Henry Ewing, Berkeley, S.C.; Sept. 8, William
Smith, Camden, Ark.; Sept. 15, Staples Green, Livingston, Ala.; Sept. 29, Hiram
Jacobs, Mount Vernon, Ga.; Sept. 29, Lucien Mannet, Mount Vernon, Ga.; Sept. 29,
Hire Bevington, Mount Vernon, Ga.; Sept 29, Weldon Gordon, Mount Vernon, Ga.;
Sept 29, Parse Strickland, Mount Vernon, Ga.; Oct. 20, William Dalton,
Cartersville, Ga.; Oct. 27, M. B. Taylor, Wise Court House, Va.; Oct 27, Isaac
Williams, Madison, Ga.; Nov. 10, Miller Davis, Center Point, Ark.; Nov. 14,
John Johnston, Auburn, N.Y; Sept
27, Calvin Stewart, Langley, S.C.; Sept 29, Henry Coleman, Benton, La.; Oct 18,
William Richards, Summerfield, Ga.; Oct 18, James Dickson, Summerfield, Ga.; Oct
27, Edward Jenkins, Clayton county, Ga.; Nov. 9, Henry Boggs, Fort White, Pa.;
Nov. 14, three unknown negroes, Lake City Junction, Fla.; Nov. 14, D. T. Nelson,
Varney, Ark.; Nov. 29, Newton Jones, Baxley, Ga.; Dec. 2, Lucius Holt,
Concord, Ga.; Dec. 10, two unknown negroes, Richmond, Ala.; July 12, Henry
Fleming, Columbus, Miss.; July 17, unknown negro, Briar Field, Ala.; July 18,
Meredith Lewis, Roseland, La.; July 29, Edward Bill, Dresden, Tenn.; Aug. 1,
Henry Reynolds, Montgomery, Tenn.; Aug. 9, unknown negro, McCreery, Ark.; Aug.
12, unknown negro, Brantford, Pa.; Aug. 18, Charles Walton, Morganfield, Ky.;
Aug. 21, Charles Tait, near Memphis, Tenn.; Aug. 28, Leonard Taylor, New Castle,
KY.; Sept. 8, Benjamin Jackson, Quincy, Miss.; Sept. 14, John Williams, Jackson,
30, unknown negro[,] Wingo, Ky.
18, two unknown negroes, Franklin Parish, La.
15, Benjamin Jackson, Jackson, Miss.; Sept. 15, Mahala Jackson, Jackson, Miss;
Sept. 15, Louisa Carter, Jackson, Miss.; Sept. 15, W. A. Haley, Jackson, Miss.;
Sept. 15, Rufus Bigley, Jackson, Miss.
18, John Hughes, Moberly, Mo.; June 2, Isaac Lincoln, Fort Madison, S.C.
20, Daniel Adams, Selina, Kan.
21, Charles Martin, Shelby Co., Tenn.; July 30, William Steen, Paris, Miss.;
August 31, unknown negro, Yarborough, Tex.; Sept 30, unknown negro, Houston,
Tex.; Dec. 28, Mack Segars, Brantley, Ala.
Charles T. Miller, Bardwell, Ky.; Aug. 10, Daniel Lewis, Waycross, Ga.; Aug.
10, James Taylor, Waycross, Ga.; Aug. 10, John Chambers, Waycross, Ga.
Dec. 16, Henry G. Givens, Negro, Ky.
23, Sloan Allen, West Mississippi.
14, Andy Blount, Chattanooga, Tenn.
19, William Ferguson, Adele, Ga.
19, James Williams, Pickens Co., Ala.; Feb. 11, unknown negro, Forest Hill,
Tenn.; Feb. 26, Joseph Hayne, or Paine, Jellico, Tenn.; Nov. 1, Abner Anthony,
Hot Springs, Va.; Nov. 1, Thomas Hill, Spring Place, Ga.; April 24, John
Peterson, Denmark, S.C.; May 6, Samuel Gaillard, S.C.; May 10, Haywood Banks, or
Marksdale, Columbia, S.C.; May 12, Israel Hallway, Napoleonville, La.; May 12,
unknown negro, Wytheville, Va.; May 31, John Wallace, Jefferson Springs, Ark.;
June 3, Samuel Bush, Decatur, Ill.; June 8, L. C. Dumas, Gleason, Tenn.; June
13, William Shorter, Winchester, Va.; June 14, George Williams, near Waco, Tex.;
June 24, Daniel Edwards, Selina or Selma, Ala.; June 27, Ernest Murphy,
Daleville, Ala.; July 6, unknown negro, Poplar Head, La.; July 6, unknown negro,
Poplar Head, La.; July 12, Robert Larkin, Oscola, Tex.; July 17, Warren Dean,
Stone Creek, Ga.; July 21, unknown negro, Brantford, Fla.; July 17, John Cotton,
Connersville, Ark.; July 22, Lee Walker, New Albany, Miss.; July 26, — Handy,
Suansea, S.C.; July 30, William Thompson, Columbia, S.C.; July 28, Isaac Harper,
Calera, Ala.; July 30, Thomas Preston, Columbia, S.C.; July 30, Handy Kaigler,
Columbia, S.C.; Aug. 13, Monroe Smith, Springfield, Ala.; Aug. 19, negro
tramp, near Paducah, KY.; Aug. 21, John Nilson, near Leavenworth, Kan.; Aug. 23,
Jacob Davis, Green Wood, S.C.; Sept 2, William Arkinson, McKenney, KY.; Sept.
16, unknown negro, Centerville, Ala.; Sept. 16, Jessie Mitchell, Amelia C. H.,
Va.; Sept 25, Perry Bratcher, New Boston, Tex.; Oct. 9, William Lacey, Jasper,
Ala.; Oct. 22, John Gamble, Pikesville, Tenn.
CHARGED ARE AS FOLLOWS
39; attempted rape, 8; alleged rape, 4; suspicion of rape, 1; murder, 44;
alleged murder, 6; alleged complicity in murder, 4; murderous assault, 1;
attempted murder, 1; attempted robbery, 4; arson, 4; incendiarism, 3; alleged
stock poisoning, 1; poisoning wells, 2; alleged poisoning wells, 5; burglary,
1; wife beating, 1; self defense, 1; suspected robbery, 1; assault and battery,
1; insulting whites, 2; malpractice, 1; alleged barn burning, 4; stealing, 2;
unknown offense, 4; no offense, 1; race prejudice, 4; total, 159.
25; Arkansas, 7; Florida, 7; Georgia, 24; Indian Territory, 1; Illinois, 3;
Kansas, 2; Kentucky, 8; Louisiana, 18; Mississippi, 17; Missouri, 3; New York,
1; South Carolina, 15; Tennessee, 10; Texas, 8; Virginia, 10.
FOR THE YEAR 1892
it is intended that the record here presented shall include specially the
lynchings of 1893, it will not be amiss to give the record for the year
preceding. The facts contended for will always appear manifest—that not
one-third of the victims lynched were charged with rape, and further that the
charges made embraced a range of offenses from murders to misdemeanors. In 1892
there were 241 persons lynched. The entire number is divided among the following
states: Alabama, 22; Arkansas, 25; California, 3; Florida, 11; Georgia, 17;
Idaho, 8; Illinois, 1; Kansas, 3; Kentucky, 9; Louisiana, 29; Maryland, 1;
Mississippi, 16; Missouri, 6; Montana, 4; New York, 1; North Carolina, 5; North
Dakota, 1; Ohio, 3; South Carolina, 5; Tennessee, 28; Texas, 15; Virginia, 7;
West Virginia, 5; Wyoming, 9; Arizona Territory, 3; Oklahoma, 2. Of this number
160 were of Negro descent. Four of them were lynched in New York, Ohio and
Kansas; the remainder were murdered in the South. Five of this number were
females. The charges for which they were lynched cover a wide range. They are as
follows: Rape, 46; murder, 58; rioting, 3; race prejudice, 6; no cause given, 4;
incendiarism, 6; robbery, 6; assault and battery, 1; attempted rape, 11;
suspected robbery, 4; larceny, 1; self defense, 1; insulting women, 2;
desperadoes, 6; fraud, 1; attempted murder, 2; no offense stated, boy and girl,
2. In the case of the boy and girl above referred to, their father, named
Hastings, was accused of the murder of a white man; his fourteen-year-old
daughter and sixteen-year-old son were hanged and their bodies, filled with
bullets, then the father was also lynched. This was in November, 1892, at